ACDSee v3 was cool. v10 is a bloated pest
Pros: ACDSee long ago was a slick and quick JPG viewer
Cons: It has gone awry and is so bloated with redundant stuff.
Posted: 26-Jul-2008 09:42:40 AM
Sort by:
Review score
[?]
|
Date
Positive Rating
|
Negative Rating
Pros: ACDSee long ago was a slick and quick JPG viewer
Cons: It has gone awry and is so bloated with redundant stuff.
Posted: 26-Jul-2008 09:42:40 AM
Was this review helpful?
1 of 2 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: fantastic piece of software which saves me a lot of keystrokes. thanks for making this freeware!
Cons: no complaints.
Posted: 26-Jul-2008 09:33:11 AM
Was this review helpful?
2 of 2 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: If you have two PCs on your desktop its a must.
Cons: Does not work with Vista Aero.
Posted: 26-Jul-2008 09:39:11 AM
Was this review helpful?
1 of 1 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: I read a lot of rants and raves about this program but i was really disappointed. There are far better freeware and open source alternatives available.
Cons: quirky user interface.
Posted: 26-Jul-2008 09:35:57 AM
Was this review helpful?
1 of 1 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: Try Clicktionary as a free alternative or leo.org.
Cons: This software contains advertisement popups even in the paid version. Then, surprisingly it even blocks me as a paying customer from using it. STAY AWAY FROM THIS *****.
Posted: 26-Jul-2008 09:37:53 AM
Was this review helpful?
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Sort by:
Review score
[?]
|
Date
Positive Rating
|
Negative Rating
| Ratings submitted: | 5 |
| Reviews written: | 5 |
| "Helpful" votes received: | 5 |
| "Not helpful" votes received: | 1 |