Sort by:
Review score
[?]
|
Date
Positive Rating
|
Negative Rating
Showing: 1-5 of 9
Pros: Normally, I like good graphical games. THis one - no 3d graphics - very 1980 ish. But the breeding plot was interesting, and I found myself capitbated, so people should be interested in triying it, despite the graphics!
Cons: Graphcis could be better in the next version!
Posted: 31-Jul-2007 01:46:36 PM
Was this review helpful?
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: Well, I like plants. And hortaculture since I'm studying it and other plant biology stuff. So the chance to have a virtual garden type deal? Amazing. I'm suprised there's not more games like it about plants. As for replay value - good times. THe graphics are pretty good too, and I dug the sounds in it. SO, I give it five stars. Thanks for listening!
Cons: Nohting
Posted: 31-Jul-2007 01:38:57 PM
Was this review helpful?
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: Tryed this, had a good time, even though I prefer WWII games. GOod stuuf!
Posted: 31-Jul-2007 01:35:48 PM
Was this review helpful?
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: Nothing. Music is repetitive and boring.( The graphics are poor at best compared to what else is out there. Strategy-nonexistent. Oh wait. One pro: somewhat less buggy than Venture Africa! I guess practice makes perfect - sort of!
Cons: Ok, let's look at this seriously. I played Venture Africa based on its good reviews. I was not impressed. On Sunday, it was a slow day, so I decided - reluctantly to try it out. Again, not impressed! Now, I?m probably a huge indie/casual gamer, and I like strategy games, so one should take that into consideration. But in this game, well, let?s say the strategy was absent. The levels were basic, boring (and the graphics/and or ?art? if you call it that was well below today?s standards ?I?d call it 1999 style!). I mean, some people say that this game is not ?money? driven, but hello ? let?s look at this ? you?re collecting ?spirits?! What do you think the ?spirits? do for you? Exactly ? what money would do in any other sim game. As for music, well, as even the hot reviews claim, its repetitive ? and frankly, turn off the music doesn?t do it for me. It?s low budget sound, which, since the sound in VA was bad, is not surprising again. Plot-well, this falls into the strategy category. There isn?t any. And as for the whole global warming theme ? seems like the company is trying to cash in on the whole ?green? movement, which I guess is alright, because everyone has to make a buck, but is still a little cheesy in my opinion. So let?s be frank. Bad graphics, bad plot/strategy, and bad music all make for a not so good game. For indie casual gamers, I?d recommend lots of other stuff. But not this. Thanks for listening!
Posted: 31-Jul-2007 01:37:07 PM
Was this review helpful?
1 of 2 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: It could have been better. I'm a big WWII fan, and I would have liked to see more stuff about the history.
Posted: 31-Jul-2007 01:34:58 PM
Was this review helpful?
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Sort by:
Review score
[?]
|
Date
Positive Rating
|
Negative Rating
Showing: 1-5 of 9
| Ratings submitted: | 9 |
| Reviews written: | 9 |
| "Helpful" votes received: | 2 |
| "Not helpful" votes received: | 1 |
