Stingy.
Pros: Looks great.
Cons: C
Posted: 13-May-2008 11:59:49 PM
Sort by:
Review score
[?]
|
Date
Positive Rating
|
Negative Rating
Pros: Looks great.
Cons: C
Posted: 13-May-2008 11:59:49 PM
Was this review helpful?
19 of 23 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: It is not as troublesome as Spyware Terminator by Crawler. Compared to ST, this real-time detection dont require any simultaneous clicks. It selects the things you need to unblock.
Cons: Lazy to detect spyware. Requires an active detector to detect for you automatically. Only manual scans.
Posted: 08-Sep-2007 01:51:44 AM
Was this review helpful?
8 of 9 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: None!!!???
Cons: This disappoints me. it has no webmail, outlook and IM messenging realtime protection. Avast, although needs pesky registration, it is worth it. Because there is everything an antivirus must do.
Posted: 07-Aug-2007 08:36:21 PM
Was this review helpful?
6 of 7 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Cons: Currently, only Youtube grabber from Easiestutils(not David Zhang) can work. They are charging USD$24.95 for the software. Can download protected music video from linkinparktv and universalmusicgroup. Refer o easiestutils.com and they will say that they are the the only grabber that can grab youtube files. Only software that can grab in the universe.
Posted: 08-Sep-2007 07:03:08 PM
Was this review helpful?
1 of 1 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: Ultrasoft Youtube video downloader 1.1.3 is another free grabber. Another alternative is the paid Easiestutils. Yippee!
Posted: 08-Sep-2007 07:22:47 PM
Was this review helpful?
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Sort by:
Review score
[?]
|
Date
Positive Rating
|
Negative Rating
| Ratings submitted: | 59 |
| Reviews written: | 58 |
| "Helpful" votes received: | 75 |
| "Not helpful" votes received: | 95 |