On GameFAQs: Grand Theft Auto IV (PS3) cheats & more!

Search:
Go!


My Profile: Cheapster

Software and GamesMusic

Sort by:  Review score [?]  |  Date
Positive Rating  |  Negative Rating

Next Previous Showing: 1-5 of 41


My rating:
2 stars
Product:

Internet Explorer

Version: 7

Hardly worth the trouble.

Pros: First IE update in years. Finally has a tabbed UI, and isn't as full of security holes.

Cons: Too little too late. There's nothing here to lure away users who have already switched to Firefox or Opera.

The interface is awkward and poorly laid out. Uses much more memory than its predecessor, doesn't always work properly with some sites or utilities.

If you're happy with Firefox, or even IE6, this new version of IE isn't going to change your life. Give MS a couple of more months to issue all the inevitable platches and updates before downloading this one...

Posted: 18-Oct-2006 07:04:14 PM

Was this review helpful?

259 of 294 users
found this review helpful.

Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.

My rating:
5 stars
Product:

OpenOffice.org

Version: 2.0.3

a slam dunk

Pros: I won't repeat what's been covered in Cnet's review. I'll just say that I've used MS Office for years, and I agree that OpenOffice is a credible alternative.

It is not a feature-for-feature clone of MS Office, but OpenOffice should be more than adequate for anyone who isn't using some of the more obscure or "advanced" features of MS Office.

Not that OpenOffice doesn't have plenty of advanced features of its own. I would think it's plenty capable of handling the tasks that even most business users would throw at it.

I've used OOo Writer to compose, edit, and share some fairly complex legal documents. Even editing a book manuscript, sent to me in Word format with change-tracking. I've used it on spreadsheets and PowerPoint-type presentations, and it did everything I needed it to do.

With its OpenDocument file formats, its ability to read and write MS Office files, and its PDF export, I have easily shared documents and files with users of other software and operating systems.

I'll admit some OpenOffice fans might get a little overly enthused at times, but when you get somthing this good and useful for free, it's hard not to. Anyone in need of good office software should try OpenOffice first.

Cons: Compared to MS Office and WordPerfect, OpenOffice is short on "wizards" and pre-made templates.

Not really a "con", but a note:

OOo is often pitched as a replacement for MS Office. If you plan to work with a lot of existing DOC, XLS, and PPT files, remember that MS Office file formats are proprietary. Only the latest version of Office itself can be expected to open 100% or them, 100% of the time, with 100% accuracy. If my own experience is anywhere near typical though, most users will have few or no problems.

Posted: 05-Jul-2006 12:24:01 PM

Was this review helpful?

98 of 103 users
found this review helpful.

Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.

My rating:
5 stars
Product:

OpenOffice.org

Version: 2.0.4

Five stars from a former MS Office user.

Pros: I used MS Office for years, and still have to use it at work, but I now prefer OpenOffice, and use it on my own computer. Its cost advantage is impossible to ignore, but I already had Office 2003 Pro, so that wasn't the only factor.

I save most of my work to ODF, which MS Office doesn't support. I also like OOo's ability to export to PDF, complete with bookmarks, links, and form elements. (PDF "printer" plugins only produce what can be printed on a page.) When I do need to share files with MS Office users, I have been able to do so without problem, as OOo does a good job of saving to DOC, XLS, and PPT file formats.

The learning curve is pretty short. If you've used Office, Works, or WordPerfect, it won't take long to get used to OpenOffice's interface. The help files are good, and there are some good PDF user guides on the OOo website.

OpenOffice has been rock-solid on my PC, and has been crash-resistant and trouble-free. Anyone looking for a good office software bundle would do well to try out OOo before spending money on something else.

Cons: PC novices won't find OOo as friendly as MS OFfice or Works. There are few templates included, and no "wizards" to speak of.

Posted: 14-Oct-2006 02:25:27 PM

Was this review helpful?

53 of 56 users
found this review helpful.

Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.

My rating:
5 stars
Product:

OpenOffice.org

Version: 2.1

Open Source, OpenDocument, and Free

Pros: At my workplace I use MS Office 2003. At home, though, I switched to OpenOffice almost two years ago, and prefer it to its MS counterpart.

OpenOffice lets me save files in OpenDocument and PDF, and I can open, edit, and share files with MS Office users too. I've shared PowerPoint files, fairly complex Excel spreadsheets, legal documents, and even a book manuscript in Word format with change-tracking, and haven't had any problems.

I use word processing the most, and I've come to prefer Writer to MS Word in some ways (and I always liked Word). There are advantages to the way it handles styles, templates, and sections that make assembling long multipart documents easier.

My PC isn't the latest or greatest, but OOo runs fast on it, and has been stable and crash-free.

I used MS Office for a long time, but now when anyone asks, I recommend they try OpenOffice first.

Cons: None, if you're an intermediate or advanced user. PC novices will find the learning curve a little steeper than MS Office.

Posted: 16-Dec-2006 05:09:39 PM

Was this review helpful?

31 of 35 users
found this review helpful.

Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.

Replies:
  No replies
› Reply to this review

My rating:
5 stars
Product:

Nvu

Version: 1.0

I've been waiting for this...

Pros: Nvu is a nice, lighter weight alternative to the likes of Dreamweaver and FrontPage. Not only is it free, it's easier to navigate and doesn't hog system resources. It would be good for newbies, but more advanced users should find it useful, too. Applying custom styles and markup is easy, it supports UTF-8 extended characters, and it doesn't hog system resources. I used Dreamweaver for years, from version 1.0 through MX 2004. I always hated its klunky interface, and now I have an alternative that doesn't bog me down with all those unused bells and whistles.

Cons: Nvu-generated source code passes validation with flying colors, but it's formatting is a little funky. Not a major drawback, though.

Posted: 11-Aug-2005 08:48:31 PM

Was this review helpful?

30 of 32 users
found this review helpful.

Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.

Replies:
  No replies
› Reply to this review

Sort by:  Review score [?]  |  Date
Positive Rating  |  Negative Rating

Next Previous Showing: 1-5 of 41

About me: Cheapster

Ratings submitted: 41
Reviews written: 41
"Helpful" votes received: 671
"Not helpful" votes received: 129


Copyright ©2008 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy policy|Terms of use