Very useful
Pros: It fixed a lot of minor issues like orphaned registry entries, leftover temp files etc.
It gives useful advices for system configuration.
Posted: 28-Nov-2006 09:23:06 AM
Sort by:
Review score
[?]
|
Date
Positive Rating
|
Negative Rating
Pros: It fixed a lot of minor issues like orphaned registry entries, leftover temp files etc.
It gives useful advices for system configuration.
Posted: 28-Nov-2006 09:23:06 AM
Was this review helpful?
2 of 2 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: A file archiver that doesn't look like a WinZip clone, finally!
Support many different archive formats (.zip, .tar, .7z...) and gives useful split files and encryption features.
Posted: 28-Nov-2006 03:35:12 AM
Was this review helpful?
5 of 5 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Pros: It's free, open source and gives great features (hig compression, encryption, split files...), it's definitely better than the overpriced WinZip.
Posted: 28-Nov-2006 04:17:13 AM
Was this review helpful?
2 of 2 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Cons: It does split files, just like WinZip, WinRar, 7-Zip and a plethora of free compression application does... and if you don't want compression you can just trun it off. Why a standalone application to do this? Why another application that offers only that function and offers none of the functions of an archiver program? Just because some users are supposed to be too lazy to use "split" function in their compression software?
Posted: 28-Nov-2006 03:44:51 AM
Was this review helpful?
3 of 5 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
› See 1 reply
› Reply to this review
Pros: Fast and reliable
Cons: It sticks on .zip file format...
C'm on, there are better formats that worth to be fully supported!
Posted: 28-Nov-2006 03:25:20 AM
Was this review helpful?
2 of 4 users
found this review helpful.
Offensive:
Does this post contain offensive content?
Flag it for our review.
Replies:
No replies
› Reply to this review
Sort by:
Review score
[?]
|
Date
Positive Rating
|
Negative Rating
| Ratings submitted: | 5 |
| Reviews written: | 5 |
| "Helpful" votes received: | 14 |
| "Not helpful" votes received: | 4 |